The politics of elections
Fight for the right to (your own) party
Editor, The Times:
People argue that they should be free to vote for any candidate of any party to hold any office. This is certainly true, and everyone has that opportunity in the general election. However, the purpose of the primary is to nominate candidates for the general election.
I am a Democrat, and I’m sure that the Republicans, Greens and Libertarians don’t want me to have a say in who will represent them in the general election. I know that I don’t want them to have a say in who will be my party’s nominee.
Washington state’s primary system has an incredibly low threshold for party affiliation; all you have to do is chose a party whose primary you wish to participate in on your ballot - no party registration necessary.
The right to associate with the party of one’s choosing is fundamental to our democracy, but it doesn’t give anyone the right to nominate another party’s candidates. One also has the right to be an independent, of course, but must realize that if you chose not to be affiliated with a party, you don’t have a say in what that party does.
Many people complain that none of the parties represent their views. The best solution is to become more active in a party. After all, they have no incentive at all to represent people who refuse to associate with them.
- Eric Berg, Seattle
Proposition 1
Sims’ stand welcome in a time when leaders often give a blank stare
I want to make sure you hear from someone who appreciates Ron Sims’ clear position against the roads-and-rail package [”The roads-and-transit plan: so much cost to do so little,” Times, guest commentary, Sept. 27]. His comments about letting the voters decide was atypical of what we can expect, these days, from elected officials who have swallowed too much of the “gotta-get-along” water in this region.
I’m sick of guessing what to do on such issues, where elected and appointed officials have all the information, but it’s up to voters to determine the benefit or folly of their vote. We elect people to try to lead us and tell us what they think, given their information and experience.
Mr. Sims, thank you for helping me understand this package. Thank you for taking a stand, and for letting us know what that stand is. You have given King County your opinion and your reasons for it. Those who trust your judgment will now know better how to evaluate their vote.
- Miryam Gordon, SeattleThe Keystone Kops taking us for a ride
About Ron Sims’ stinging rebuke of the ill-conceived Proposition 1 ballot measure, transit-board Chairman John Ladenburg says, “I’m not a big believer in endorsements” [”Sims to vote ‘no’ on ‘Roads & Transit’ measure,” Local News, Sept. 28].
I can identify with his opinion, except that it’s Un-Sound Transit that exceeds my capacity for belief. Un-Sound Transit has been a Keystone Kops operation from day one, and is apparently simply a way for its employees to work at a governmental agency and thereby build up retirement benefits.
Millions for bread and circuses, but not one more dime for Un-Sound Transit!
- Jay Kridner, SeattleWatch out, polar bears
RTID [Regional Transportation Investment District] will cook polar bears and light-rail commuters alike. No matter what good RTID could do, it would do irreparable harm to any progress we could make to slow global warming. A Puget Sound Regional Council study predicts the roads portion of the package would cause a 45 percent increase in car miles traveled. That would be the hot kiss of death to every creature, from polar bears to commuters. This bill must be exorcised and brought back as a stand-alone public-transportation bill.
The future could be bright if we address our addiction to cars. The first step? Stop building new roads to serve sprawl.
This compromise bill was brought to us through our flawed deal-making political process that caters to selfish voters. That same process has us killing for oil. We need to open our eyes, grow up and work toward a sustainable future.
Run, don’t drive, to vote against RTID.
- Jack Tomkinson, SeattleDoing something now is better than nothing
I could only laugh when I read that Ron Sims is urging us to vote no on Proposition 1 this November, saying that we must wait until “real transportation solutions” are before us - this coming from someone who was on the Sound Transit governing board. This is the same person who thinks it is a great idea to rip up rail tracks that essentially run the length of Interstate 405 to put in a trail, which would essentially destroy any chances of putting in light rail or a Sounder train from Snohomish to Renton in the future. (It is no coincidence that Proposition 1 would allow this corridor to be studied for such a purpose.)
I urge everyone to ignore his lackluster argument and vote yes on Proposition 1. Doing something now is far better than doing nothing. You cannot put a price on that!
- Will Brandt, Lake StevensSims tells it like it is
Good for you, Ron Sims! You’ve called out Proposition 1 as the misguided boondoggle that it is. In our current climate crisis, we need to do more now. For example, those billions of dollars could provide free 15-minute bus service to any locale in the county for decades!
By the way, when are you running for governor, Mr. Sims? For your integrity and being brave enough to say out loud, “folks, this [Proposition 1] emperor is buck-nekkid!”, you can count on my vote, my contribution and my volunteer time.
- Judith Rickard, SeattleJane Hague
It’s past time to put away the scarlet S for “scandal”
Enough already. So Jane Hague made some mistakes. Let’s get out the wooden crossbeams and spikes and go to work with a heavy hammer.
So she gave to her own campaign - with her own money. Hillary Clinton made less of a fuss when she grudgingly gave back $850,000 donated by a criminal on the lam - and has rarely been accused of using her own money for anything.
The college-credit imbroglio is too ridiculous to make an issue of even for The Times. Let’s not bring up all the good things she’s done for King County; after all, it might skew a good story.
Then we have the so-called DUI. It’s a good lesson for all of us, even for all the nondrinking reporters - if such a species exist. When one is tired and under stress it’s not the best time to have a glass of wine.
However, Jane didn’t:
Drive off a bridge and kill someone;
Slam into a tree;
Or sideswipe other cars and then claim to be too drunk to remember.
Why is it when a Republican makes a mistake they are supposed to slit their throat, and yet Democrats are consistently given a pass?
To put things in perspective, if a member of the Kennedy clan had made these “mistakes,” it would be considered just another day at the office. And a boring one at that.
- Denny Andrews, BellevueSex offenders
Reaction an overreaction
Regarding “School on alert over sex offender,” [Local News, Sept. 13], if the offender is present when children are not, then he is not hurting anyone or tempting himself. The Mountlake Terrace school overreacted and took it too far.
Timothy McKenna is living temporarily with his sponsors, and the school singling him out is not aiding his recovery. He is a person, not just a thing they can get rid of.
Sex offenders can change their ways, and it has been almost 12 years since his last offense. He is living permanently in Marysville in a halfway house for sex offenders. Nothing in his conditions upon release stated he could not live temporarily next to a school. When he was released, a standard community alert was issued. McKenna served his time but will always carry the burden of his past.
He is now no harm to the school, neighborhood or community.
- Alexis Hamilton, KirklandSonics
Bennet isn’t winning any popularity contests
Clay Bennett needs to wake up. He knew the Sonics were losing money when he bought them. He knew the taxpayers would not pay for another arena for him. He knew there was a contract with KeyArena that he would have to honor. He knew he was not going to keep the Sonics or the Storm here from the beginning.
He lied.
I, like a lot of other people, am sick of seeing him on the news and hearing his lies. Do what you have to do, and just shut up. If you leave, the teams will be missed, but you won’t be.
- JoAnn McCord, RentonSend the team to pack and citizens to the track
I went to the University of Kansas (in the state just north of Oklahoma), where I took 15 semester hours of calculus and three semester hours of economics. I guess what I needed to take to understand the current situation with the Sonics was the course in “Oklahoma business math” that Clay Bennett must have taken.
Then I might understand why, if one loses $17 million a season, one would need to spend (or to get Seattle to spend) a half-billion dollars on a new arena to make up for that loss [”Blame flies as city sues Sonics,” page one, Sept. 25].
I think Seattle has the right idea in standing firm on this, but maybe not for the right reason. The emphasis on spectator sports versus participatory sports may be one reason we are all so fat. Getting rid of spectator sports would make municipal coffers fat and the citizens lean.
- Thomas J. Munyon, MarysvilleCall her President Clinton, please … or not
Ambition somehow equals demonization
Sen. Hillary Clinton has always been a lightning rod. If you dislike her politics, you know what you to do at the polls. If you dislike her husband, you also know what to do.
We know she is ambitious - and yes, I remember Whitewater. And she’s the only one? At least some of our senators are indicted or convicted felons. (Perhaps we need to hear about Idaho one more time?)
What bothers me about all of this is that she seems to be continuously demonized. God forbid she should be smart, ambitious and qualified.
My fondest hope is that journalists behave like journalists and not a bunch of tabloid hacks, and that the people pointing fingers take a good look in the mirror, scour their own consciences (assuming they have one), and then tell me what they think.
- Beverly Verner, KentInsurance logic 101
I’ve read recent letters to the editor decrying Hilary Clinton’s health-care plan for requiring healthy people to get health insurance - “especially those who need it the least,” according to one writer [”She’s rough on the help,” Northwest Voices, Sept. 23].
I’m not sure how to break the news to these people, but that’s how insurance works.
- Mark Damberg, SeattleHillary’s not exactly reinventing the wheel
Many people seem to be concerned that they will be forced to buy insurance under Hillary Clinton’s universal health-care plan. What many people do not know is that they already do. Every time someone who does not have insurance goes to the emergency room, we who do have insurance have to pay for them.
And emergency-room care is much more expensive then preventive care.
- Barry Meister, West RichlandCalling H.G. Wells …
Let’s see: O.J. Simpson has been in jail and Hillary Clinton is pushing a costly big government health-care plan. Did I go through a time warp and it’s 1994 again?
- David Glenn, Renton